ArticleScientific reports2025
Mechanistic insights into gut microbe derived siderophores and PHD2 interactions with implications for HIF-1α stabilization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discovery of Potential GPRC5D Inhibitors through Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.ChemistryOpen · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In oxygen-deprived conditions, cells respond by activating adaptive mechanisms to bolster their survival and protect tissue integrity. A key player in this process is the HIF-1α signaling cascade, meticulously regulated by Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain 2 (PHD2), which orchestrates cellular responses to varying oxygen levels. The primary aim of this investigation is to utilize gut siderophores as inhibitors of PHD2 in ischemic conditions. This study also helps in understanding the structural mechanisms by which gut microbiota regulate HIF-1α via PHD2 inhibition through the secretion of siderophores. We explore potential PHD2 inhibitors through in-silico approaches, specifically molecular docking, binding pose metadynamics, molecular dynamics simulations, and free energy calculations. We evaluated siderophores secreted by gut microbiota as candidate inhibitors for PHD2. Docking studies revealed that Salmochelin SX exhibits the highest binding affinity to PHD2 (- 9.527 kcal/mol), interacting with key residues such as ASP254, TYR310, ASP315, and ARG322. Despite its high affinity, binding pose metadynamics indicated instability for Salmochelin SX, whereas Staphyloferrin A demonstrated superior stability. Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed stable ligand interactions with PHD2, highlighting HIS313 and ASP315 as critical for inhibition. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Free Energy Landscape (FEL) analyses underscored conformational changes and binding stability, suggesting that these interactions may stabilize PHD2's active site and have potential therapeutic implications. Additionally, the study reveals how gut microbiota prevent gut dysbiosis through the stabilization of HIF-1α signaling by secreting siderophores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.