ArticleJCI insight2025
Multidimensional analyses identify genes of high priority for pancreatic cancer research.
Article in JCI insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pancreatic cancer: molecular pathogenesis and emerging therapeutic strategies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Updates in the diagnosis and management of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Sendai virus is robust and consistent in delivering genes into human pancreatic cancer cells.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a drug-resistant and lethal cancer. Identification of the genes that consistently show altered expression across patient cohorts can expose effective therapeutic targets and strategies. To identify such genes, we separately analyzed 5 human PDAC microarray datasets. We defined genes as "consistent" if upregulated or downregulated in 4 or more datasets (adjusted P < 0.05). The genes were subsequently queried in additional datasets, including single-cell RNA-sequencing data, and we analyzed their pathway enrichment, tissue specificity, essentiality for cell viability, and association with cancer features, e.g., tumor subtype, proliferation, metastasis, and poor survival outcome. We identified 2,010 consistently upregulated and 1,928 downregulated genes, of which more than 50% to our knowledge were uncharacterized in PDAC. These genes spanned multiple processes, including cell cycle, immunity, transport, metabolism, signaling, and transcriptional/epigenetic regulation - cell cycle and glycolysis being the most altered. Several upregulated genes correlated with cancer features, and their suppression impaired PDAC cell viability in prior CRISPR/Cas9 and RNA interference screens. Furthermore, the upregulated genes predicted sensitivity to bromodomain and extraterminal (epigenetic) protein inhibition, which, in combination with gemcitabine, disrupted amino acid metabolism and in vivo tumor growth. Our results highlight genes for further studies in the quest for PDAC mechanisms, therapeutic targets, and biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.