ArticleScientific reports2025
Segmentation of the iliac crest from CT-data for virtual surgical planning of facial reconstruction surgery using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Assistance to Autonomy: Acceptability of Progressive Artificial Intelligence Integration in Facial Reconstructive Surgery-Protocol for Within-Subjects Vignette Experiment Among Romanian Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated segmentation of the fibula from CT imaging using two-stepped deep learning in 3D U-Net architectures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Segmenting beyond the imaging data: creation of anatomically valid edentulous mandibular geometries for surgical planning using artificial intelligence.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- A User-Friendly Software for Automated Knowledge-Based Virtual Surgical Planning in Mandibular Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesFor the planning of surgical procedures involving the bony reconstruction of the mandible, the autologous iliac crest graft, along with the fibula graft, has become established as a preferred donor region. While computer-assisted planning methods are increasingly gaining importance, the necessary preparation of geometric data based on CT imaging remains largely a manual process. The aim of this work was to develop and test a method for the automated segmentation of the iliac crest for subsequent reconstruction planning.
methodsA total of 1,398 datasets with manual segmentations were obtained as ground truth, with a subset of 400 datasets used for training and validation of the Neural Networks and another subset of 177 datasets used solely for testing. A deep Convolutional Neural Network implemented in a 3D U-Net architecture using Tensorflow was employed to provide a pipeline for automatic segmentation. Transfer learning was applied for model training optimization. Evaluation metrics included the Dice Similarity Coefficient, Symmetrical Average Surface Distance, and a modified 95% Hausdorff Distance focusing on regions relevant for transplantation.
resultsThe automated segmentation achieved high accuracy, with qualitative and quantitative assessments demonstrating predictions closely aligned with ground truths. Quantitative evaluation of the correspondence yielded values for geometric agreement in the transplant-relevant area of 92% +/- 7% (Dice coefficient) and average surface deviations of 0.605 +/- 0.41 mm. In all cases, the bones were identified as contiguous objects in the correct spatial orientation. The geometries of the iliac crests were consistently and completely recognized on both sides without any gaps.
conclusionsThe method was successfully used to extract the individual geometries of the iliac crest from CT data. Thus, it has the potential to serve as an essential starting point in a digitized planning process and to provide data for subsequent surgical planning. The complete automation of this step allows for efficient and reliable preparation of anatomical data for reconstructive surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.