ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Mobile health van as an intervention to provide clinical support and health promotion to street children and marginalised populations in the National Capital Region of Delhi: a mixed-methods evaluation.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrban health challenges, particularly for street and slum-dwelling children and families, have emerged as one of the most significant health concerns in India. While there is little published on effective healthcare delivery to these populations, mobile health vans (MHV) have been proposed as a proactive pathway to providing outreach healthcare. Our aims were to evaluate the impact of Bal Umang Drishya Sanstha (BUDS) MHV in providing health and support services to the urban slum populations in Delhi National Capital Region (NCR), focusing on benefits to children.
methodsThis was a mixed-methods evaluation, using routinely collected data. We collated and reviewed available data recorded by the BUDS staff in their health record system from June 2017 to December 2023. Qualitative data were provided by two recent focus group discussions carried out in the community; one with 18 mothers and another with a mixed group of 12 adults-all had used MHV clinics for children in their families. We chose two typical case studies that were reported to the funding bodies.
resultsBetween 2017 and 2023, there were a total of 41 062 clinic visits for children<18 years, with visits increasing steadily and peaking at 8864 in 2023. Just under 10% of encounters were referred to specialist services, 122 children were diagnosed with disability. Health education sessions were provided mainly in group settings, to over 70 000 children. Themes extracted from focus group discussions were enhanced access to healthcare, quality of care, value adds from MHV and suggestions for improvement. Families expressed overwhelming appreciation of BUDS MHV. Case studies illustrated the benefits of facilitated access to tertiary healthcare.
conclusionsMHV can serve as a valuable source of primary healthcare for street and slum-dwelling children and their families. Other benefits are empowering communities with health literacy and negotiating pathways to tertiary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.