ArticleBMJ open2025
Development of a core outcome set and core measurement set for kangaroo mother care: a study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcome Reporting in Clinical Trials on Kangaroo Mother Care in Newborns: A Systematic Review for the Development of Core Outcome Set.Journal of nursing management · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKangaroo mother care (KMC) is a care of preterm and low birthweight infants carried skin-to-skin contact with the mother's chest and breastfeeding when possible. KMC has been proven to reduce mortality and morbidity in these infants. However, research on KMC has been limited by significant variability and inconsistency in reported outcomes across studies. These discrepancies hinder the inclusion of KMC clinical research in systematic reviews or meta-analyses, reducing its research value, leading to resource wastage and raising concerns about selective reporting biases. A core outcome set (COS), which defines a list of critical outcomes, can help harmonise the outcomes reported across studies in the same healthcare field. Further, how these outcomes should be measured and/or reported is defined in a core measurement set (CMS). This study aims to develop both a COS and a CMS for KMC to standardise outcome reporting, improve the quality assessments in clinical trials and facilitate data integration. This protocol outlines the methodology for developing a COS and CMS for KMC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The development of the COS and CMS for KMC will follow six phases: (1) a systematic review, (2) semistructured interviews, (3) merging outcomes, (4) two/three rounds of international Delphi survey, (5) a consensus meeting and (6) development of the CMS. In phases 1 and 2, we will conduct a systematic review and semistructured interviews to identify potential core outcomes and measurements, which will form an initial outcome pool. In phase 3, these outcomes will be categorised into domains based on the core outcome measures for effectiveness (COMET) classification, creating a long list of outcomes for the Delphi survey. In phase 4, the Delphi survey will involve two/three rounds with key stakeholders, including neonatal clinical experts (including doctors and nurses), users of COS (including editors, public health experts, experts in evidence-based medicine and researchers), parents of neonates and policymakers, to refine the candidate core outcomes and measurements. In phase 5, an online consensus meeting with representatives of all stakeholders will finalise the COS. In phase 6, the CMS will be following Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments guidelines, which involve conceptual considerations, finding existing outcome measurement instruments, assessing their quality and selecting appropriate instruments for the COS. Parents of neonates will participate in phases 2, 4 and 5. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval of this study has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital (Medical Research 2024 ethics approval no. 167). The finalised COS and CMS will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: We have registered the COS in the COMET database (http://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2940).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.