ArticleBMJ open2025
Comparative cross-sectional study on the prevalence, determinants and willingness to use long-acting reversible contraception among female students attending public and private universities in Ekiti State, Southwest Nigeria.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLong-acting reversible contraception (LARC) provides continuous pregnancy prevention to women for a period of 3 to 12 years, and it is very safe and effective. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, determinants and willingness to use LARC among undergraduate female students attending public and private universities in Ekiti State, Southwest Nigeria
designThis survey employed a cross-sectional comparative study design.
settingPublic and private universities in Ekiti State, Southwest Nigeria.
participants418 female students in their undergraduate years at public and private universities (208 students in public universities and 210 students in private universities). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: A semistructured questionnaire was used to gather data, and analysis was done using IBM SPSS V.25. Prevalence, willingness and determinants of LARC were determined and compared between public and private universities at the level of bivariate analysis using χ
resultsThe mean age of female undergraduate students was higher in public universities (21.1±2.5 years) than in private universities (19.3±2.1 years). The prevalence of LARC usage among the sexually active respondents was 12.5% for public universities and 12.7% for private universities. Determinants and predictors of LARC uptake among the students in both university settings were age, marital status and good knowledge of LARC. Only about one quarter (24.0% in public universities and 24.8% in private universities) were willing to take up LARC among the students in both settings.
conclusionThe prevalence and willingness to take up LARC in the public and private universities are still low. Determinants and predictors of LARC uptake include age, marital status and good knowledge of LARC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.