Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39773685›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

The technical expert/clinical user/patient panel (TECUPP): centering patient and family perspectives in patient-reported measure development.

Elizabeth Marsolais, Rebecca Anhang Price, Carl T Berdahl, Anton Shenk, Lucy Schulson, Claire E O'Hanlon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth MarsolaisRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1776-378X
Rebecca Anhang PriceRAND, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8351-8654
Carl T BerdahlRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-3280
Anton ShenkRAND, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4694-4758
Lucy SchulsonSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9774-6372
Claire E O'HanlonRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA. cohanlon@rand.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-5845

Funding

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality K08HS029534Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation grants #11504 and #11504.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient and caregiver perspectives are increasingly incorporated into health care research and policymaking, but their inclusion in the quality measure development process often is not robust. We describe a stakeholder panel model for incorporating patient/caregiver voices in the development of patient-reported measures, the Technical Expert/Clinical User/Patient Panel (TECUPP) model. This model is characterized by significant or equal representation of people with lived experience of the disease or condition (as patients or caregivers) to the clinicians and others with technical expertise who typically comprise technical expert panels. We report key design features of the TECUPP model and how we used this model to develop survey-based patient experience measures of timeliness of cancer diagnosis. We describe benefits and challenges of using the TECUPP model and considerations to guide others who might use it as part of developing patient-centered quality measures, based on our experience convening a TECUPP to inform development of a patient-reported measure on timeliness of cancer diagnosis. Benefits include creating space for significant contributions from patients/caregivers and development of a shared understanding of patient experiences and observability of measure domains between clinicians and patients/caregivers. Challenges include time management and managing conversations outside the project scope. Measure development efforts implementing this model should consider recruiting diverse individuals, scheduling short and frequent meetings, enabling participation from all TECUPP members, developing accessible pre-read materials, anchoring meetings with patient stories, and encouraging multiple communication modes. The TECUPP model promotes discussion and understanding by patients/caregivers and clinicians/measure experts helpful for development of survey-based patient-reported measures.

Indexed as

Co-designHealth care qualityLived experienceMeasure developmentPatient experiencePatient-reportedQuality measureTechnical expert panel

Identifiers

PMID39773685
PMCPMC11708192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.