Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39773397›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2025

Real-world effectiveness of hemodialysis modalities: a retrospective cohort study.

Yan Zhang, Anke Winter, Belén Alejos Ferreras, Paola Carioni, Otto Arkossy, Michael Anger, Robert Kossmann, Len A Usvyat, Stefano Stuard, Franklin W Maddux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Effect of core stability exercise training on activities of daily living, fatigue level and balance in haemodialysis patients: A randomised controlled study.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yan ZhangFresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Hessen, Germany. Yan.Zhang@freseniusmedicalcare.com.
Anke WinterFresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Hessen, Germany.
Belén Alejos FerrerasFresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Hessen, Germany.
Paola CarioniFresenius Medical Care Italia S.p.A, Vaiano Cremasco, Milan, Italy.
Otto ArkossyFresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Hessen, Germany.
Michael AngerFresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc, Waltham, MA, USA.
Robert KossmannFresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc, Waltham, MA, USA.
Len A UsvyatFresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc, Waltham, MA, USA.
Stefano StuardFresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Hessen, Germany.
Franklin W MadduxFresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Hessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResults from the CONVINCE clinical trial suggest a 23% mortality risk reduction among patients receiving high-volume (> 23 L) hemodiafiltration. We assessed the real-world effectiveness of blood-based kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with hemodiafiltration vs. hemodialysis in a large, unselected patient population treated prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed pseudonymized data from 85,117 adults receiving in-center care across NephroCare clinics in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa during 2019-2022. Cox regression models with KRT modality and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status as time-varying covariates, and adjusted for multiple confounders, were used to estimate all-cause (primary) and cardiovascular (secondary) mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed for age, dialysis vintage, COVID-19 status, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

resultsAt baseline, 55% of patients were receiving hemodialysis and 45% of patients were receiving hemodiafiltration. Baseline characteristics were similar between baseline modalities, except that hemodiafiltration patients were a median of 2 years younger, had higher percentage of fistula access (66% vs. 47%), and had longer mean dialysis vintages (4.4 years vs. 2.6 years). Compared with hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.76-0.80), irrespective of COVID-19 infection. The pattern of a beneficial effect of hemodiafiltration was consistently observed among all analyzed subgroups. Among patients receiving high-volume hemodiafiltration (mean convection volume ≥ 23 L), the risk of death was reduced by 30% (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.68-0.72]). Hemodiafiltration was also associated with a 31% reduced risk of cardiovascular death.

conclusionsOur results suggest that hemodiafiltration has a beneficial effect on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a large, unselected patient population and across patient subgroups in real-world settings. Our study complements evidence from the CONVINCE trial and adds to the growing body of real-world evidence on hemodiafiltration.

Indexed as

COVID-19HemodiafiltrationRenal DialysisAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeCardiovascular mortalityHemodiafiltrationHigh-flux hemodialysisKidney replacement therapyMortality

Identifiers

PMID39773397
PMCPMC11706171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.