Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39773366›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Analytical performance of OncoPrism-HNSCC, an RNA-based assay to inform immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decisions for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Jeffrey Hiken, Jon Earls, Kevin C Flanagan, Rachel L Wellinghoff, Michelle Ponder, David N Messina, Jarret I Glasscock, Eric J Duncavage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeffrey HikenCofactor Genomics, Inc, 4044 Clayton Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Jon EarlsCofactor Genomics, Inc, 4044 Clayton Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Kevin C FlanaganCofactor Genomics, Inc, 4044 Clayton Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Rachel L WellinghoffCofactor Genomics, Inc, 4044 Clayton Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Michelle PonderCofactor Genomics, Inc, 4044 Clayton Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
David N MessinaCofactor Genomics, Inc, 4044 Clayton Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Jarret I GlasscockCofactor Genomics, Inc, 4044 Clayton Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. jarret_glasscock@cofactorgenomics.com.
Eric J DuncavageDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies can significantly improve outcomes for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC), only about 15-20% benefit from such treatments. Clinical tests that guide the use of ICIs are therefore critically needed. OncoPrism-HNSCC was developed to address this need. The assay combines next generation RNA sequencing-based immunomodulatory gene expression signatures with machine learning algorithms to generate an OncoPrism score that classifies patients as having low, medium, or high likelihood of disease control in response to ICI treatment. Also, OncoPrism-HNSCC leverages the same FFPE patient tumor RNA used for ICI response prediction to identify rare cases where oncogenic rearrangements in NTRK1/2/3 or ALK genes may occur, and which may indicate the use of potentially highly effective targeted therapies. The clinical performance of OncoPrism-HNSCC has been validated. Here, we report its analytical performance in the presence of potentially confounding sources of variation.

methodsThe assay's analytical sensitivity was assessed by varying RNA input quantity and quality, observing the effect on ICI response prediction scores. Analytical specificity was tested by spiking increasing percentages of genomic DNA into input RNA. Intra-assay and inter-assay precision were evaluated, and the analytical sensitivity, specificity, and precision of gene fusion detection were assessed. Concordance with orthogonal methods of gene fusion detection was tested on 67 FFPE clinical samples.

resultsVarying RNA inputs as low as four-fold below the nominal input amount had little effect on ICI response prediction scores. RNA quality levels below the test threshold had no significant effect. Genomic DNA spike-ins up to 30% had only a small effect on scores. The pooled standard deviation for multiple operators, reagent lots, batches, and sequencers yielded an overall variance represented by just 0.87% of the score range of the test (0-100). NTRK and ALK gene fusion detection was 100% concordant with orthogonal methods.

conclusionsRobust and reliable analytical performance of the OncoPrism-HNSCC assay supports its clinical use, even in the presence of variation typically encountered in the laboratory setting.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckBiomarkers, TumorClinical Decision-MakingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMachine LearningBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAnalytical validationAssayBiomarkerClassifierHead and neck cancerHNSCCOncoPrism

Identifiers

PMID39773366
PMCPMC11705923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.