ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
CDPMF-DDA: contrastive deep probabilistic matrix factorization for drug-disease association prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- KGTC-DDA:Drug-disease association prediction based on parallel graph isomorphism and transformer networks with cross-attention.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Recent Developments and Structure-Activity Relationships of BRAF Inhibitors for Cancer Drug Discovery.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2026Review
- Redox-linked hormetic responses of Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunal to Mn, Zn, and Fe supplementation in vitro.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Multi-DDA: drug-disease association prediction using a hybrid graph convolutional network with multi-modal drug representations.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Multi criterion decision making analysis of hematologic cancer drugs via topological indices and physicochemical properties.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The covalent docking software landscape: features and applications in drug design.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The process of new drug development is complex, whereas drug-disease association (DDA) prediction aims to identify new therapeutic uses for existing medications. However, existing graph contrastive learning approaches typically rely on single-view contrastive learning, which struggle to fully capture drug-disease relationships. Subsequently, we introduce a novel multi-view contrastive learning framework, named CDPMF-DDA, which enhances the model's ability to capture drug-disease associations by incorporating diverse information representations from different views. First, we decompose the original drug-disease association matrix into drug and disease feature matrices, which are then used to reconstruct the drug-disease association network, as well as the drug-drug and disease-disease similarity networks. This process effectively reduces noise in the data, establishing a reliable foundation for the networks produced. Next, we generate multiple contrastive views from both the original and generated networks. These views effectively capture hidden feature associations, significantly enhancing the model's ability to represent complex relationships. Extensive cross-validation experiments on three standard datasets show that CDPMF-DDA achieves an average AUC of 0.9475 and an AUPR of 0.5009, outperforming existing models. Additionally, case studies on Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy further validate the model's effectiveness, demonstrating its high accuracy and robustness in drug-disease association prediction. Based on a multi-view contrastive learning framework, CDPMF-DDA is capable of integrating multi-source information and effectively capturing complex drug-disease associations, making it a powerful tool for drug repositioning and the discovery of new therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.