ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025
Ventilation distribution during spontaneous breathing trials predicts liberation from mechanical ventilation: the VISION study.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure or Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Thoracic electrical impedance tomography from technological promise to clinical reality: the Chinese experience.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Clinical Application of Electrical Impedance Tomography in Emergency and Critical Care Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effect of lateral positioning on ventilation in patients with blunt thoracic injury during pressure support ventilation: the VICTORY study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- EIT-based ventilation phenotypes of left-to-right asymmetry and ventral-to-dorsal center in PEEP titration in ARDS.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Recent advances in experimental and clinical applications of chest electrical impedance tomography: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
- High-flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive ventilation in stabilized hypercapnic exacerbation: a physiological crossover trial.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Ventilator-induced lung injury: from mechanisms to integrated clinical management.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics and Inspiratory Effort During Spontaneous Breathing Trials to Predict Extubation Failure in High-Risk Patients.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Lung electrical impedance tomography during positioning, weaning and chest physiotherapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Impact of pressure support ventilation duration after a spontaneous breathing trial on reintubation rates in critically ill subjects: a retrospective study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Real-time stress and strain monitoring at the bedside: new frontiers in mechanical ventilation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting complete liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV) is still challenging. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) offers a non-invasive measure of regional ventilation distribution and could bring additional information. RESEARCH QUESTION: Whether the display of regional ventilation distribution during a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) could help at predicting early and successful liberation from MV. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsPatients were monitored with EIT during the SBT. The tidal image was divided into ventral and dorsal regions and displayed simultaneously. We explored the ventral-to-dorsal ventilation difference in percentage, and its association with clinical outcomes. Liberation success was defined pragmatically as passing SBT followed by extubation within 24 h without reintubation for 7 days. Failure included use of rescue therapy, reintubation within 7 days, tracheostomy, and not being extubated within 24 h after succesful SBT. A training cohort was used for discovery, followed by a validation cohort.
resultsAmong a total of 98 patients analyzed, 85 passed SBT (87%), but rapid liberation success occurred only in 40; 13.5% of extubated patients required reintubation. From the first minutes to the entire SBT duration, the absolute ventral-to-dorsal difference was consistently smaller in liberation success compared to all subgroups of failure (p < 0.0001). An absolute difference at 5 min of SBT > 20% was associated with failure of liberation, with sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 78% and positive predictive value 81% in a validation cohort.
conclusionDuring SBT, a large ventral-to-dorsal difference in ventilation indicated by EIT may help to rapidly identify patients at risk of liberation failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.