ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Tracing the paths of modular evolution by quantifying rearrangement events of protein domains.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergence and evolution of protein-coding de novo genes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Evolution of the Metazoan Protein Domain Repertoire Revealed by a Birth-Death-Gain Model.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProtein evolution is central to molecular adaptation and largely characterized by modular rearrangements of domains, the evolutionary and structural building blocks of proteins. Genetic events underlying protein rearrangements are relatively rare compared to changes of amino-acids. Therefore, these events can be used to characterize and reconstruct major events of molecular adaptation by comparing large data sets of proteomes.
resultsHere we determine, at unprecedented completeness, the rates of fusion, fission, emergence and loss of domains in five eukaryotic clades (monocots, eudicots, fungi, insects, vertebrates). By characterizing rearrangements that were previously considered "ambiguous" or "complex" we raise the fraction of resolved rearrangement events from previously ca. 60% to around 92%. We exemplify our method by analyzing the evolutionary histories of protein rearrangements in (i) the extracellular matrix, (ii) innate immunity across Eukaryota, Metazoa, and Vertebrata, and (iii) Toll-Like-Receptors in the innate immune system of Eukaryota. In all three cases we can find hot-spots of rearrangement events in their phylogeny which (i) can be related with major events of adaptation and (ii) which follow the emergence of new domains which become integrated into existing arrangements.
conclusionOur results demonstrate that, akin to the change at the level of amino acids, domain rearrangements follow a clock-like dynamic which can be well quantified and supports the concept of evolutionary tinkering. While many novel domain emergence events are ancient, emerged domains are quickly incorporated into a great number of proteins. In parallel, the observed rates of emergence of new domains are becoming smaller over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.