ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
SVMVGGNet-16: A Novel Machine and Deep Learning Based Approaches for Lung Cancer Detection Using Combined SVM and VGGNet-16.
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of lung cancer using Kronecker mobile forward harmonic net.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-spatial channel attention and inceptionv3-based CAD system with optimized MLP for lung cancer detection.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Masked autoencoding, generalizable pretraining, and integrated experts for enhanced glioma segmentation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Cortisol, cardiovascular risk, and anxiety in full-time workers in Cartagena, Colombia, 2023.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Lightweight CNN for accurate brain tumor detection from MRI with limited training data.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveLung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, necessitating early and accurate detection methods. Our study aims to enhance lung cancer detection by integrating VGGNet-16 form of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) into a hybrid model (SVMVGGNet-16), leveraging the strengths of both models for high accuracy and reliability in classifying lung cancer types in different 4 classes such as adenocarcinoma (ADC), large cell carcinoma (LCC), Normal, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
methodsUsing the LIDC-IDRI dataset, we pre-processed images with a median filter and histogram equalization, segmented lung tumors through thresholding and edge detection, and extracted geometric features such as area, perimeter, eccentricity, compactness, and circularity. VGGNet-16 and SVM employed for feature extraction and classification, respectively. Performance matrices were evaluated using accuracy, AUC, recall, precision, and F1-score. Both VGGNet-16 and SVM underwent comparative analysis during the training, validation, and testing phases.
resultsThe SVMVGGNet-16 model outperformed both, with a training accuracy (97.22%), AUC (99.42%), recall (94.22%), precision (95.28%), and F1- score (94.68%). In testing, our SVMVGGNet-16 model maintained high accuracy (96.72%), with an AUC (96.87%), recall (84.67%), precision (87.40%), and F1-score (85.73%).
conclusionOur experimental results demonstrate the potential of SVMVGGNet-16 in improving diagnostic performance, leading to earlier detection and better treatment outcomes. Future work includes refining the model, expanding datasets, conducting clinical trials, and integrating the system into clinical practice to ensure practical usability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.