Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39772961›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Aquatic-terrestrial linkages drive contrasting biodiversity patterns in tropical and temperate forests.

Liam N Nash, Fátima C Recalde, Timothy Chambers, Victor S Saito, Gustavo Q Romero, Pavel Kratina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liam N NashCentre for Biodiversity and Sustainability, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-9217
Fátima C RecaldeLaboratory of Multitrophic Interactions and Biodiversity, Department of Animal Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo 13083-862, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0717-1596
Timothy ChambersCentre for Biodiversity and Sustainability, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-7916-0133
Victor S SaitoEnvironmental Sciences Department, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo 13565-905, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6112-7249
Gustavo Q RomeroLaboratory of Multitrophic Interactions and Biodiversity, Department of Animal Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo 13083-862, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3736-4759
Pavel KratinaCentre for Biodiversity and Sustainability, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9144-7937

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da AmazôniaNatural Environment Research CouncilRoyal Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Riparian ecosystems harbour unique biodiversity because of their close interconnections with adjacent aquatic ecosystems. Yet, how aquatic ecosystems influence terrestrial biodiversity over different spatial scales is poorly understood, particularly in the tropics. We conducted field campaigns to collect 235 terrestrial invertebrate assemblages along 150 m transects from 47 streams in both Brazil and the UK, compiling one of the largest known datasets of riparian invertebrate community composition at multiple spatial scales. Invertebrate densities increased towards water in both regions. In Brazil, this was driven by an increase in spiders, with a corresponding decrease in non-predators, resulting in higher predator : prey ratios near water. In the UK, non-predator densities increased towards water, decreasing predator : prey ratios. While pairwise dissimilarity increased with distance from water in both regions, β-diversity was significantly higher in tropical assemblages, with more β-diversity explained by turnover. Spider community composition was significantly structured by distance from water in the Brazilian sites, suggesting tropical assemblages were influenced more by emerging aquatic prey, with a distinct spider community replacing other predators, with possible top-down control of terrestrial prey. High turnover-driven dissimilarity among tropical assemblages suggests that Brazilian riparian ecosystems are better managed at the landscape scale, with an emphasis on in-stream measures preventing disruption of aquatic resource subsidies.

Indexed as

BiodiversityForestsInvertebratesSpidersAnimalsBrazilEcosystemRiversTropical ClimateUnited Kingdomaquatic–terrestrial linkagesbeta-diversitycommunity analysisriparian biodiversityspiderstropical–temperate comparisons

Identifiers

PMID39772961
PMCPMC11706639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.