ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Silent cells? Potential for context-dependent gene expression in mature sperm.
Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Sperm-Epididymosomes Interaction Immediately Before Fertilization Changes Sperm Fertility Potential.Andrology · 2026Article
- Proteomic dynamics of bull sperm during post-testicular maturation.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Effects of Selenium Nanoparticles and Sodium Selenite Supplementation on Cryopreserved Ram Sperm Quality, Oxidative Status, and PRDX5 Gene Expression.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Thirty Years of the Biology of Spermatozoa: The Rise and Future of an Evolutionary Paradigm.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Dynamic sperm proteome remodeling during epididymal maturation in a marsupial, Macropus giganteus†.Biology of reproduction · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sperm are traditionally viewed as transcriptionally and translationally silent cells. However, observations that components of the cellular machinery of gene expression are maintained in ejaculated sperm are increasingly cited as challenges to this fundamental assumption. Here, we critically evaluate these arguments and present three lines of evidence from both model and non-model systems that collectively raise the question of whether ejaculated sperm may be capable of active gene expression. First, and critical for arguments surrounding the possibility of differential gene expression, we review recent evidence that spermatozoa may retain the capacity to transcribe and translate their genomes. Second, we highlight how sperm cells can exhibit differential transcript quantities across different post-ejaculation environments. Third, we ask whether the accumulating evidence of remarkable phenotypic plasticity in post-ejaculatory sperm phenotypes could be mechanistically underpinned by changes in sperm gene expression. While these lines of evidence are indirect and do not definitively show transcription of sperm genomes, we highlight how emerging technologies may enable us to test this hypothesis explicitly. Our review advocates for progress in this field and highlights several important evolutionary, ecological and practical implications that will probably transcend disciplines to the clinical and applied reproductive sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.