Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39772919›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2025

Gene expression comparisons between captive and wild shrew brains reveal captivity effects.

Maria Alejandra Bedoya Duque, William R Thomas, Dina K N Dechmann, John Nieland, Cecilia Baldoni, Dominik von Elverfeldt, Marion Muturi, Angelique P Corthals, Liliana M Dávalos

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A universally applicable definition for domestication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria Alejandra Bedoya DuqueDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas Bioprocesos y Biotecnología, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-9803
William R ThomasDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-3858-2440
Dina K N DechmannMax-Planck Institute for Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0043-8267
John NielandHealth Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7423-0122
Cecilia BaldoniMax-Planck Institute for Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-1341-9456
Dominik von ElverfeldtDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-3528
Marion MuturiMax-Planck Institute for Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.
Angelique P CorthalsJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5610-2992
Liliana M DávalosDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4327-7697

Funding

Hearst FoundationsHuman Frontiers of Science ProgramStony Brook University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with their free-ranging counterparts, wild animals in captivity experience different conditions with lasting physiological and behavioural effects. Although shifts in gene expression are expected to occur upstream of these phenotypes, we found no previous gene expression comparisons of captive versus free-ranging mammals. We assessed gene expression profiles of three brain regions (cortex, olfactory bulb and hippocampus) of wild shrews (

Indexed as

BrainShrewsAnimalsAnimals, WildAnimals, ZooCerebral CortexFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHippocampusMaleOlfactory BulbTranscriptomebraincaptivityshrewtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39772919
PMCPMC11706642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.