Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39772745›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

A synapse-specific refractory period for plasticity at individual dendritic spines.

Juan C Flores, Dipannita Sarkar, Karen Zito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The how and why for multiple forms of hippocampal LTP.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. A synapse-specific refractory period for plasticity at individual dendritic spines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Unraveling the mysteries of dendritic spine dynamics: Five key principles shaping memory and cognition.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan C FloresCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA 95618.
Dipannita SarkarCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA 95618.
Karen ZitoCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA 95618.

Funding

Mechanisms of Dendritic Spine EliminationR01NS062736 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZITO, KAREN · 2009 to 2019
$3.8M
Predoctoral Training in Pharmacological SciencesT32GM099608 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HELL, JOHANNES W · 2012 to 2021
$2.2M
Synaptic plasticity mechanisms that protect and refine local circuitsR56MH139176 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M, ZITO, KAREN · 2024 to 2024
$467k
Saturation of Synaptic Plasticity at Individual Dendritic SpinesF99NS125772 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FLORES, JUAN C · 2021 to 2022
$80k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM099608NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH139176NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS125772NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS062736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How newly formed memories are preserved while brain plasticity is ongoing has been a source of debate. One idea is that synapses which experienced recent plasticity become resistant to further plasticity, a type of metaplasticity often referred to as saturation. Here, we probe the local dendritic mechanisms that limit plasticity at recently potentiated synapses. We show that recently potentiated individual synapses exhibit a synapse-specific refractory period for further potentiation. We further found that the refractory period is associated with reduced postsynaptic CaMKII signaling; however, stronger synaptic activation fully restored CaMKII signaling but only partially restored the ability for further plasticity. Importantly, the refractory period is released after one hour, a timing that coincides with the enrichment of several postsynaptic proteins to preplasticity levels. Notably, increasing the level of the postsynaptic scaffolding protein, PSD95, but not of PSD93, overcomes the refractory period. Our results support a model in which potentiation at a single synapse is sufficient to initiate a synapse-specific refractory period that persists until key postsynaptic proteins regain their steady-state synaptic levels.

Indexed as

Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Dendritic SpinesDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinNeuronal PlasticitySynapsesAnimalsLong-Term PotentiationMembrane ProteinsRatsSignal TransductionCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Disks Large Homolog 4 ProteinMembrane Proteinsdendritic spinemetaplasticityPSD-95synaptic plasticitytwo-photon imaging

Identifiers

PMID39772745
PMCPMC11745398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.