ArticleScience advances2025
Virtual Gram staining of label-free bacteria using dark-field microscopy and deep learning.
Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Broadband backscattering confocal microscopy enables label-free 3D live cell nanoscale sensitive imaging.Science advances · 2026Article
- Bile Acid Deconjugation and Anti-Helicobacter pylori Activity of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 34531.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Pathogen Detection: Algorithms, Biosensing Platforms, and Applications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Sex, age, and seasonal distribution characteristics of bacterial and fungal infections.PloS one · 2026Article
- Simple-synthesis VO₂ nanoparticles as robust nanozymes for synergistic antibacterial therapy and abscess repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Narrative Review of Recent Clinical Applications, Implementation Strategies, and Challenges.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gram staining has been a frequently used staining protocol in microbiology. It is vulnerable to staining artifacts due to, e.g., operator errors and chemical variations. Here, we introduce virtual Gram staining of label-free bacteria using a trained neural network that digitally transforms dark-field images of unstained bacteria into their Gram-stained equivalents matching bright-field image contrast. After a one-time training, the virtual Gram staining model processes an axial stack of dark-field microscopy images of label-free bacteria (never seen before) to rapidly generate Gram staining, bypassing several chemical steps involved in the conventional staining process. We demonstrated the success of virtual Gram staining on label-free bacteria samples containing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.