ArticleJournal of global health2022
Newborn signal functions in Bangladesh: Identification through expert consultation and assessment of readiness among public health facilities.
Article in Journal of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing health systems' capacities to provide post-abortion care: insights from seven low- and middle-income countries.Journal of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify a set of newborn signal functions (NSFs) that can categorize health facilities and assist policymakers and health managers in appropriately planning and adequately monitoring the progress and performance of health facilities delivering newborn health care in Bangladesh and similar low-income settings. Methods: A modified Delphi method was used to identify a set of NSFs and a cross-sectional health facility assessment among the randomly selected facilities was conducted to test them in public health facilities in Bangladesh. In the modified Delphi approach, three main steps of listing, prioritizing, and testing were followed to identify the set of NSFs. Then, to finalize the set of NSFs and its variables, a total of five Delphi workshops and three rounds of Delphi surveys were conducted. Finally, 205 public health facilities located in 41 randomly selected districts were assessed for the availability and readiness of finalized NSFs using the updated tool of Bangladesh Health Facility Survey (BHFS) 2017. Results: Twenty NSFs were identified and finalized, nine of which were categorized as primary NSFs, 13 as basic NSFs, 18 as comprehensive NSFs, and 20 as advanced NSFs. Almost all district hospitals (DHs), Upazila health complexes (UHCs,) and maternal and child welfare centres (MCWCs) performed the primary NSFs in the last three months. However, around one-third of the union health and family welfare centres (UH&FWCs) and very few community clinics (CCs) performed them during the same period. The basic, comprehensive, and advanced NSF readiness was inadequate and inappropriate across all types of facilities, including DHs and UHCs. Conclusions: In the absence of internationally or nationally agreed-upon NSFs to measure a health facility's service availability and readiness for providing newborn care, this study becomes the first to identify and finalize a set of NSFs and to incorporate relevant variables in the health facility assessment tool which can be used to monitor the availability and readiness of a newborn care facility. The identified NSFs can also be adapted for the countries with similar contexts and can serve as a standard base to determine a global set of NSFs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.