ArticleViruses2024
A Possible Protective Effect of IgA Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Bronchoalveolar Lavage in COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein IgA is associated with worse disease severity in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Mucosal Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Using Human ProbioticVaccines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a humoral immune response, producing virus-specific antibodies such as IgM, IgG, and IgA. IgA antibodies are present at mucosal sites, protecting against respiratory and other mucosal infections, including SARS-CoV-2, by neutralizing viruses or impeding attachment to epithelial cells. Since SARS-CoV-2 spreads through the nasopharynx, the specific IgAs of SARS-CoV-2 are produced quickly after infection, effectively contributing to virus neutralization. Dimeric IgA has been reported to be 10 to 15 times more potent than its equivalent IgG, suggesting that this isotype may be particularly interesting in developing new monoclonal antibodies and/or new vaccines efficiently neutralizing the virus at the mucosal sites. It is still unclear whether IgA antibodies in BAL might play a role in the disease course and if their presence may have a prognostic significance. However, a harmful effect on diseases with high IgA titers has been reported. This study evaluated mucosal-specific IgA and IgG profiles in BAL of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory failure admitted to the ICU. We included 57 patients (41 males and 16 females), admitted to the ICU of the University of Foggia. We used a commercially available ELISA assay to evaluate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA antibodies in plasma and BAL of the 57 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory failure. However, 40/57 BAL and plasma from infected patients were available for the ELISA test; the remaining specimens were unsuitable. IgG and IgA antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detectable in 37 (92.5%) and 40 (100%) plasma specimens, respectively. IgG antibodies were found in a single sample, while IgAs were detected in 19 of 40 BAL samples analyzed. Correlations between these parameters and patient outcomes reveal a signature associated with survival. Interestingly, a statistically significant inverse correlation was found between the mortality rate and the presence of IgA to SARS-CoV-2 in BAL specimens. None of the 19 patients with a positive IgA died, compared to 7 out of 12 patients with a negative IgA-BAL (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.