ArticleVaccines2024
Analysis of Implementation Strategies for Nationwide HPV Vaccination Programs Across European Union Countries.
Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Human papillomavirus and vaccine knowledge, willingness, and uptake among university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- The structural and organizational aspects of human papillomavirus vaccine affecting immunization coverage in Europe: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- HPV vaccine awareness and vaccination status among women of reproductive age in Türkiye: A cross-sectional study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- HPV-16-Induced Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: HPV Vaccination May Be Useful.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs play a critical role in the primary prevention of HPV-related diseases, including cervical cancer. However, the principles governing the implementation of these programs vary across European Union (EU) countries. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the strategies for implementing HPV vaccination programs across the EU, with a focus on access, vaccine selection, and procurement processes.
methodsThis study utilized a comprehensive review of official websites from government bodies, public health organizations, and dedicated vaccination platforms in each of the 27 EU member states. Additionally, a search of Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) was conducted to examine the criteria used in tendering processes for vaccine suppliers involved in national HPV vaccination programs.
resultsAll 27 EU countries provide public funding for HPV vaccination, with 26 countries offering free vaccination for both girls and boys. In 22 of these countries, the nine-valent HPV vaccine is the only option available for free under national programs. Estonia and Ireland are exceptions, where a single dose of Gardasil 9 is administered. Most countries adhere to the approved vaccination schedules, though slight variations exist. The predominant criterion for selecting vaccine suppliers in national tenders is the lowest price offered.
conclusionsHPV vaccination programs across the EU are uniformly funded through public health systems, yet access to free vaccination and specific program details vary by country. These variations reflect the diverse healthcare systems and procurement strategies in place, which can impact the systemic approach to HPV prevention. Further harmonization of vaccine procurement and implementation strategies may enhance the effectiveness and equity of HPV vaccination across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.