ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Overview of Wearable Healthcare Devices for Clinical Decision Support in the Prehospital Setting.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathophysiology-guided biomarkers and therapeutics for precision trauma medicine in polytrauma with musculoskeletal injuries.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Reliability of contactless vital sign measurement algorithms for use in drone-based mass casualty triage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Enhancing Trauma Care: Machine Learning-Based Photoplethysmography Analysis for Estimating Blood Volume During Hemorrhage and Resuscitation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prehospital medical care is a major challenge for both civilian and military situations as resources are limited, yet critical triage and treatment decisions must be rapidly made. Prehospital medicine is further complicated during mass casualty situations or remote applications that require more extensive medical treatments to be monitored. It is anticipated on the future battlefield where air superiority will be contested that prolonged field care will extend to as much 72 h in a prehospital environment. Traditional medical monitoring is not practical in these situations and, as such, wearable sensor technology may help support prehospital medicine. However, sensors alone are not sufficient in the prehospital setting where limited personnel without specialized medical training must make critical decisions based on physiological signals. Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems can instead be utilized to interpret these signals for diagnosing injuries, making triage decisions, or driving treatments. Here, we summarize the challenges of the prehospital medical setting and review wearable sensor technology suitability for this environment, including their use with medical decision support triage or treatment guidance options. Further, we discuss recommendations for wearable healthcare device development and medical decision support technology to better support the prehospital medical setting. With further design improvement and integration with decision support tools, wearable healthcare devices have the potential to simplify and improve medical care in the challenging prehospital environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.