ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Analyzing and Modeling the Dynamic Electrical Characteristics of Nanocomposite Large-Range Strain Gauges.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexible high-deflection strain gauges have been demonstrated to be cost-effective and accessible sensors for capturing human biomechanical deformations. However, the interpretation of these sensors is notably more complex compared to conventional strain gauges, particularly during dynamic motion. In addition to the non-linear viscoelastic behavior of the strain gauge material itself, the dynamic response of the sensors is even more difficult to capture due to spikes in the resistance during strain path changes. Hence, models for extracting strain from resistance measurements of the gauges most often only work well under quasi-static conditions. The present work develops a novel model that captures the complete dynamic strain-resistance relationship of the sensors, including resistance spikes, during cyclical movements. The forward model, which converts strain to resistance, comprises the following four parts to accurately capture the different aspects of the sensor response: a quasi-static linear model, a spike magnitude model, a long-term creep decay model, and a short-term decay model. The resulting sensor-specific model accurately predicted the resistance output, with an R-squared value of 0.90. Additionally, an inverse model which predicts the strain vs. time data that would result in the observed resistance data was created. The inverse model was calibrated for a particular sensor from a small amount of cyclic data during a single test. The inverse model accurately predicted key strain characteristics with a percent error as low as 0.5%. Together, the models provide new functionality for interpreting high-deflection strain sensors during dynamic strain measurement applications, including wearables sensors used for biomechanical modeling and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.