ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Robust Method for Validating Orientation Sensors Using a Robot Arm as a High-Precision Reference.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time and Frequency Domain Analysis of IMU-Based Orientation Estimation Algorithms with Comparison to Robotic Arm Orientation as Reference.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a robust and efficient method for validating the accuracy of orientation sensors commonly used in practical applications, leveraging measurements from a commercial robotic manipulator as a high-precision reference. The key concept lies in determining the rotational transformations between the robot's base frame and the sensor's reference, as well as between the TCP (Tool Center Point) frame and the sensor frame, without requiring precise alignment. Key advantages of the proposed method include its independence from the exact measurement of rotations between the reference instrumentation and the sensor, systematic testing capabilities, and the ability to produce repeatable excitation patterns under controlled conditions. This approach enables automated, high-precision, and comparative evaluation of various orientation sensing devices in a reproducible manner. Moreover, it facilitates efficient calibration and analysis of sensor errors, such as drift, noise, and response delays under various motion conditions. The method's effectiveness is demonstrated through experimental validation of an Inertial Navigation System module and the SLAM-IMU fusion capabilities of the HTC VIVE VR headset, highlighting its versatility and reliability in addressing the challenges associated with orientation sensor validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.