Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39771907›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Attention-Based PSO-LSTM for Emotion Estimation Using EEG.

Hayato Oka, Keiko Ono, Adamidis Panagiotis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hayato OkaMaster's Program in Information and Computer Science, Doshisha University, Kyoto 610-0394, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-6870-8147
Keiko OnoDepartment of Intelligent Information Engineering and Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto 610-0394, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-3441-4191
Adamidis PanagiotisDepartment of Information and Electronic Engineering, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4020-1328

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K12097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in emotion recognition through Artificial Intelligence (AI) have demonstrated potential applications in various fields (e.g., healthcare, advertising, and driving technology), with electroencephalogram (EEG)-based approaches demonstrating superior accuracy compared to facial or vocal methods due to their resistance to intentional manipulation. This study presents a novel approach to enhance EEG-based emotion estimation accuracy by emphasizing temporal features and efficient parameter space exploration. We propose a model combining Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) with an attention mechanism to highlight temporal features in EEG data while optimizing LSTM parameters through Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The attention mechanism assigned weights to LSTM hidden states, and PSO dynamically optimizes the vital parameters, including units, batch size, and dropout rate. Using the DEAP and SEED datasets, which serve as benchmark datasets for emotion estimation research using EEG, we evaluate the model's performance. For the DEAP dataset, we conduct a four-class classification of combinations of high and low valence and arousal states. We perform a three-class classification of negative, neutral, and positive emotions for the SEED dataset. The proposed model achieves an accuracy of 0.9409 on the DEAP dataset, surpassing the previous state-of-the-art accuracy of 0.9100 reported by Lin et al. The model attains an accuracy of 0.9732 on the SEED dataset, recording one of the highest accuracies among the related research. These results demonstrate that integrating the attention mechanism with PSO significantly improves the accuracy of EEG-based emotion estimation, contributing to the advancement of emotion recognition technology.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEmotionsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceAttentionHumansNeural Networks, Computerattention mechanismDEAPEEGemotion estimationfour-class classificationLSTMPSOSEEDthree-class classification

Identifiers

PMID39771907
PMCPMC11679865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.