ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Case Study on EEG Signal Correlation Towards Potential Epileptic Foci Triangulation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The precise localization of epileptic foci with the help of EEG or iEEG signals is still a clinical challenge with current methodology, especially if the foci are not close to individual electrodes. On the research side, dipole reconstruction for focus localization is a topic of recent and current developments. Relatively low numbers of recording electrodes cause ill-posed and ill-conditioned problems in the inversion of lead-field matrices to calculate the focus location. Estimations instead of tissue conductivity measurements further deteriorate the precision of location tasks. In addition, time-resolved phase shifts are used to describe connectivity. We hypothesize that correlations over runtime approaches might be feasible to predict seizure foci with adequate precision. In a case study on EEG correlation in a healthy subject, we found repetitive periods of alternating high correlation in the short (20 ms) and long (300 ms) range. During these periods, a numerical determination of proportions of predominant latency and, newly established here, directionality is possible, which supports the identification of loops that, according to current opinion, manifest themselves in epileptic seizures. In the future, this latency and directionality analysis could support focus localization via dipole reconstruction using new triangulation calculations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.