Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39771847›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Personalized Clustering for Emotion Recognition Improvement.

Laura Gutiérrez-Martín, Celia López-Ongil, Jose M Lanza-Gutiérrez, Jose A Miranda Calero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura Gutiérrez-MartínDepartamento de Tecnología Electrónica, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avenida de la Universidad, 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0679-7300
Celia López-OngilDepartamento de Tecnología Electrónica, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avenida de la Universidad, 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9451-6611
Jose M Lanza-GutiérrezDepartamento de Ciencias de la Computación, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-5015
Jose A Miranda CaleroInstituto de Estudios de Género, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Calle Madrid, 126, 28903 Getafe, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7275-4616

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2022-142710OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion recognition through artificial intelligence and smart sensing of physical and physiological signals (affective computing) is achieving very interesting results in terms of accuracy, inference times, and user-independent models. In this sense, there are applications related to the safety and well-being of people (sexual assaults, gender-based violence, children and elderly abuse, mental health, etc.) that require even more improvements. Emotion detection should be done with fast, discrete, and non-luxurious systems working in real time and real life (wearable devices, wireless communications, battery-powered). Furthermore, emotional reactions to violence are not equal in all people. Then, large general models cannot be applied to a multi-user system for people protection, and health and social workers and law enforcement agents would welcome customized and lightweight AI models. These semi-personalized models will be applicable to clusters of subjects sharing similarities in their emotional reactions to external stimuli. This customization requires several steps: creating clusters of subjects with similar behaviors, creating AI models for every cluster, continually updating these models with new data, and enrolling new subjects in clusters when required. An initial approach for clustering labeled data compiled (physiological data, together with emotional labels) is presented in this work, as well as the method to ensure the enrollment of new users with unlabeled data once the AI models are generated. The idea is that this complete methodology can be exportable to any other expert systems where unlabeled data are added during in-field operation and different profiles exist in terms of data. Experimental results demonstrate an improvement of 5% in accuracy and 4% in F1 score with respect to our baseline general model, along with a 32% to 58% reduction in variability, respectively.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmotionsAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansWearable Electronic Devicesaffective computingclusteringexportable methodologysemi-personalized AIunlabeled datauser typology

Identifiers

PMID39771847
PMCPMC11679474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.