ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Improving the Performance of Electrotactile Brain-Computer Interface Using Machine Learning Methods on Multi-Channel Features of Somatosensory Event-Related Potentials.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From head to toe: Efficient somatosensory mapping with fast stimulation and multivariate pattern analysis.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Depression Detection from Three-Channel Resting-State EEG Using a Hybrid Conv1D and Spectral-Statistical Fusion Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional tactile brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), particularly those based on steady-state somatosensory-evoked potentials, face challenges such as lower accuracy, reduced bit rates, and the need for spatially distant stimulation points. In contrast, using transient electrical stimuli offers a promising alternative for generating tactile BCI control signals: somatosensory event-related potentials (sERPs). This study aimed to optimize the performance of a novel electrotactile BCI by employing advanced feature extraction and machine learning techniques on sERP signals for the classification of users' selective tactile attention. The experimental protocol involved ten healthy subjects performing a tactile attention task, with EEG signals recorded from five EEG channels over the sensory-motor cortex. We employed sequential forward selection (SFS) of features from temporal sERP waveforms of all EEG channels. We systematically tested classification performance using machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machines, random forests, and artificial neural networks. We explored the effects of the number of stimuli required to obtain sERP features for classification and their influence on accuracy and information transfer rate. Our approach indicated significant improvements in classification accuracy compared to previous studies. We demonstrated that the number of stimuli for sERP generation can be reduced while increasing the information transfer rate without a statistically significant decrease in classification accuracy. In the case of the support vector machine classifier, we achieved a mean accuracy over 90% for 10 electrical stimuli, while for 6 stimuli, the accuracy decreased by less than 7%, and the information transfer rate increased by 60%. This research advances methods for tactile BCI control based on event-related potentials. This work is significant since tactile stimulation is an understudied modality for BCI control, and electrically induced sERPs are the least studied control signals in reactive BCIs. Exploring and optimizing the parameters of sERP elicitation, as well as feature extraction and classification methods, is crucial for addressing the accuracy versus speed trade-off in various assistive BCI applications where the tactile modality may have added value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.