Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39771784›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Numerical Investigation of a Microfluidic Biosensor Based on I-Shaped Micropillar Array Electrodes.

Maliheh Azimi Roueini, Amal Kabalan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maliheh Azimi RoueiniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA.
Amal KabalanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micropillar array electrodes offer several advantages, such as enhanced mass transport, lower detection limits, and the potential for miniaturization, making them instrumental in the design and fabrication of electrochemical biosensors. The performance of these biosensors is influenced by electrode geometry, including parameters like shape and height, which affect surface area and overall sensitivity. In this study, we designed a microfluidic electrochemical biosensor featuring micropillar array electrodes, modeled in COMSOL Multiphysics. We compared the response currents of I-shaped and cylindrical micropillar array electrodes. The working electrode (WE), consisting of 100 micropillars with a height of 300 µm, exhibited a sensitivity of 1.61 µA·cm

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesElectrodesElectrochemical TechniquesEquipment DesignMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsCOMSOL Multiphysicsmicrofluidic biosensormicropillar array

Identifiers

PMID39771784
PMCPMC11679452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.