ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Remote Sensing Techniques for Water Quality Monitoring: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Ground-Based Hyperspectral Remote Sensing System for High-Frequency Monitoring of Riverine Organic Carbon.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- HyMambaNet: Efficient Remote Sensing Water Extraction Method Combining State Space Modeling and Multi-Scale Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating environmental and health data: insights and lessons from Australia's water monitoring systems.Journal of water and health · 2025Review
- Predicting nepetalactone accumulation in Nepeta persica using machine learning algorithms and geospatial analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-Source Pansharpening of Island Sea Areas Based on Hybrid-Scale Regression Optimization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Freshwater resources are facing increasing challenges to water quality, due to factors such as population growth, human activities, climate change, and various human-made pressures. While on-site methods, as specified in the USGS water quality sampling handbook, are usually precise, they require more time, are costly, and provide data at specific points, which lacks the essential comprehensive geographic and temporal detail for water body assessment and management. Hence, conventional on-site monitoring methods are unable to provide a complete representation of freshwater systems. To address concerns regarding geographic and time-based coverage, remote sensing has developed into an effective solution, taking advantage of recent advancements in sensor technology and methodologies. The combination of GPS and GIS technologies, along with remotely sensed data, provides an efficient resource for continual monitoring and evaluation of water bodies. The use of remotely sensed data helps to establish a reliable geospatial database, serving as a standard for subsequent evaluations. The review emphasizes the contribution of remote sensing to water monitoring. It starts by exploring various space-borne and airborne sensors utilized for this purpose. Subsequently, the review explores remote sensing applications for water quality. Lastly, the review discusses the overall benefits and challenges related to remote sensing in water monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.