ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
XAI GNSS-A Comprehensive Study on Signal Quality Assessment of GNSS Disruptions Using Explainable AI Technique.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hindering of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) signal reception by jamming and spoofing attacks degrades the signal quality. Careful attention needs to be paid when post-processing the signal under these circumstances before feeding the signal into the GNSS receiver's post-processing stage. The identification of the time domain statistical attributes and the spectral domain characteristics play a vital role in analyzing the behaviour of the signal characteristics under various kinds of jamming attacks, spoofing attacks, and multipath scenarios. In this paper, the signal records of five disruptions (pure, continuous wave interference (CWI), multi-tone continuous wave interference (MCWI), multipath (MP), spoofing, pulse, and chirp) are examined, and the most influential features in both the time and frequency domains are identified with the help of explainable AI (XAI) models. Different Machine learning (ML) techniques were employed to assess the importance of the features to the model's prediction. From the statistical analysis, it has been observed that the usage of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) models in GNSS signals to test the types of disruption in unknown GNSS signals, using only the best-correlated and most important features in the training phase, provided a better classification accuracy in signal prediction compared to traditional feature selection methods. This XAI model reveals the black-box ML model's output prediction and provides a clear explanation of the specific signal occurrences based on the individual feature contributions. By using this black-box revealer, we can easily analyze the behaviour of the GNSS ground-station signals and employ fault detection and resilience diagnosis in GNSS post-processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.