ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Development of Inductive Current Transformer 400/5/1 of Class 0.2S for Frequency Range 50 Hz-5 kHz.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental evaluation and accuracy analysis of inductive current transformers under realistic nonlinear and harmonic-rich load conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analytical Investigation of Primary Waveform Distortion Effect on Magnetic Flux Density in the Magnetic Core of Inductive Current Transformer and Its Transformation Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- B-H Curve Estimation and Air Gap Optimization for High-Performance Split Core.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the development of a window-type inductive current transformer (iCT) with a rated primary current equal to 400 A and two secondary windings with rated currents of 5 A and 1 A. Its novelty concerns the presentation of this process in the case of an iCT with a 0.2S accuracy class ensured not only for a sinusoidal current of a frequency of 50 Hz but also for the transformation of distorted current in the harmonic frequency range from 50 Hz to 5 kHz. The maximum permissible values of the current error and phase displacement are equal to ±0.2% and ±0.2°, respectively, and are the same as the limiting values for a 50 Hz sinusoidal current of a rated RMS value. In the design process, three materials were considered for the construction of the developed iCT 400/5/1: electrical steel, permalloy and nanocrystalline (Nano). Their wideband properties were analyzed and the choice of the Nano magnetic core was justified with the already-available data in the literature on the basis of elaborated design assumptions. In order to specify its particular type, four magnetic cores with different initial magnetic permeabilities were tested. It was demonstrated that, as far as more favorable magnetic properties also involved increased active power losses in the magnetic core, it was not an appropriate choice for the construction of the iCT, especially for the transformation of the current with a main frequency equal to 50 Hz or 60 Hz.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.