Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39771736›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Accurate Book Spine Detection Network Based on Improved Oriented R-CNN.

Haibo Ma, Chaobo Wang, Ang Li, Aide Xu, Dong Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haibo MaLibrary, Panjin Campus of Dalian University of Technology, Panjin 124000, China.
Chaobo WangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.
Ang LiSchool of Information Science and Technology, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.
Aide XuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.
Dong HanLibrary, Panjin Campus of Dalian University of Technology, Panjin 124000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Book localization is crucial for the development of intelligent book inventory systems, where the high-precision detection of book spines is a critical requirement. However, the varying tilt angles and diverse aspect ratios of books on library shelves often reduce the effectiveness of conventional object detection algorithms. To address these challenges, this study proposes an enhanced oriented R-CNN algorithm for book spine detection. First, we replace the standard 3 × 3 convolutions in ResNet50's residual blocks with deformable convolutions to enhance the network's capacity for modeling the geometric deformations of book spines. Additionally, the PAFPN (Path Aggregation Feature Pyramid Network) was integrated into the neck structure to enhance multi-scale feature fusion. To further optimize the anchor box design, we introduce an adaptive initial cluster center selection method for K-median clustering. This allows for a more accurate computation of anchor box aspect ratios that are better aligned with the book spine dataset, enhancing the model's training performance. We conducted comparison experiments between the proposed model and other state-of-the-art models on the book spine dataset, and the results demonstrate that the proposed approach reaches an mAP of 90.22%, which outperforms the baseline algorithm by 4.47 percentage points. Our method significantly improves detection accuracy, making it highly effective for identifying book spines in real-world library environments.

Indexed as

book spine detectiondeformable convolutionK-median clusteringoriented R-CNNsecondary feature fusion

Identifiers

PMID39771736
PMCPMC11679322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.