Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39771683›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Eye-Tracking Characteristics: Unveiling Trust Calibration States in Automated Supervisory Control Tasks.

Keran Wang, Wenjun Hou, Huiwen Ma, Leyi Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keran WangSchool of Intelligent Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, No. 1 Nanfeng Road, Shahe Higher Education Park, Shahe Area, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China.
Wenjun HouSchool of Digital Media & Design Arts, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, No. 10 Xitucheng Road, Beijing 100876, China.
Huiwen MaSchool of Digital Media & Design Arts, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, No. 10 Xitucheng Road, Beijing 100876, China.
Leyi HongSchool of Digital Media & Design Arts, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, No. 10 Xitucheng Road, Beijing 100876, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trust is a crucial human factor in automated supervisory control tasks. To attain appropriate reliance, the operator's trust should be calibrated to reflect the system's capabilities. This study utilized eye-tracking technology to explore novel approaches, given the intrusive, subjective, and sporadic characteristics of existing trust measurement methods. A real-world scenario of alarm state discrimination was simulated and used to collect eye-tracking data, real-time interaction data, system log data, and subjective trust scale values. In the data processing phase, a dynamic prediction model was hypothesized and verified to deduce and complete the absent scale data in the time series. Ultimately, through eye tracking, a discriminative regression model for trust calibration was developed using a two-layer Random Forest approach, showing effective performance. The findings indicate that this method may evaluate the trust calibration state of operators in human-agent collaborative teams within real-world settings, offering a novel approach to measuring trust calibration. Eye-tracking features, including saccade duration, fixation duration, and the saccade-fixation ratio, significantly impact the assessment of trust calibration status.

Indexed as

automated supervisory controleye trackingRandom Foresttrust calibrationtrust measurement

Identifiers

PMID39771683
PMCPMC11679395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.