ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Eye-Tracking Characteristics: Unveiling Trust Calibration States in Automated Supervisory Control Tasks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Black Box to Transparency: The Impact of Multi-Level Visualization on User Trust in Autonomous Driving.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trust is a crucial human factor in automated supervisory control tasks. To attain appropriate reliance, the operator's trust should be calibrated to reflect the system's capabilities. This study utilized eye-tracking technology to explore novel approaches, given the intrusive, subjective, and sporadic characteristics of existing trust measurement methods. A real-world scenario of alarm state discrimination was simulated and used to collect eye-tracking data, real-time interaction data, system log data, and subjective trust scale values. In the data processing phase, a dynamic prediction model was hypothesized and verified to deduce and complete the absent scale data in the time series. Ultimately, through eye tracking, a discriminative regression model for trust calibration was developed using a two-layer Random Forest approach, showing effective performance. The findings indicate that this method may evaluate the trust calibration state of operators in human-agent collaborative teams within real-world settings, offering a novel approach to measuring trust calibration. Eye-tracking features, including saccade duration, fixation duration, and the saccade-fixation ratio, significantly impact the assessment of trust calibration status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.