Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39771651›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Measurement Properties of Wearable Kinematic-Based Data Collection Systems to Evaluate Ball Kicking in Soccer: A Systematic Review with Evidence Gap Map.

Luiz H Palucci Vieira, Filipe M Clemente, Rui M Silva, Kelly R Vargas-Villafuerte, Felipe P Carpes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luiz H Palucci VieiraGrupo de Investigación en Tecnología Aplicada a la Seguridad Ocupacional, Desempeño y Calidad de Vida (GiTaSyC), Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Campus Callao, Universidad César Vallejo (UCV), Callao 07001, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-6981-756X
Filipe M ClementeEscola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-2842
Rui M SilvaEscola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3380-864X
Kelly R Vargas-VillafuerteFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Campus Callao, Universidad César Vallejo (UCV), Callao 07001, Lima, Peru.
Felipe P CarpesApplied Neuromechanics Research Group, Laboratory of Neuromechanics, Federal University of Pampa (Unipampa), P.O. Box 118, Uruguaiana 97500-970, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-4855

Funding

Fondo de Apoyo a la Investigación Docente Investiga UCV (PROYECTO RENACYT UCV 2023) IdProyecto 2761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinematic assessment of ball kicking may require significant human effort (e.g., traditional vision-based tracking systems). Wearables offer a potential solution to reduce processing time. This systematic review collated measurement properties (validity, reliability, and/or accuracy) of wearable kinematic-based technology systems used to evaluate soccer kicking. Seven databases were searched for studies published on or before April 2024. The protocol was previously published and followed the PRISMA 2020 statement. The data items included any validity, reliability, and/or accuracy measurements extracted from the selected articles. Twelve articles (1011 participants) were included in the qualitative synthesis, showing generally (92%) moderate methodological quality. The authors claimed validity (e.g., concurrent) in seven of the eight studies found on the topic, reliability in two of three, and accuracy (event detection) in three of three studies. The synthesis method indicated moderate evidence for the concurrent validity of the MPU-9150/ICM-20649 InvenSense and PlayerMaker™ devices. However, limited to no evidence was identified across studies when considering wearable devices/systems, measurement properties, and specific outcome variables. To conclude, there is a knowledge base that may support the implementation of wearables to assess ball kicking in soccer practice, while future research should further evaluate the measurement properties to attempt to reach a strong evidence level.

Indexed as

SoccerWearable Electronic DevicesBiomechanical PhenomenaData CollectionEvidence GapsHumansReproducibility of Resultsaccuracyfootballhuman movementmeasurement errorperformance analysisquality controlreliabilitysports engineeringtechniquevalidity

Identifiers

PMID39771651
PMCPMC11678956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.