Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39771589›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2024

Drug Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier: A New Strategy for the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.

Yimai Jiao, Luosen Yang, Rujuan Wang, Guoqiang Song, Jingxuan Fu, Jinping Wang, Na Gao, Hui Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nanoformulations in epilepsy therapy - a systematic review of emerging strategies in status epilepticus.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Magnetically guided BiRSC advances · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yimai JiaoKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, School of Health Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Luosen YangSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Rujuan WangKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, School of Health Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Guoqiang SongKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, School of Health Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Jingxuan FuKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, School of Health Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Jinping WangKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, School of Health Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Na GaoTianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.
Hui WangKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, School of Health Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) serves as a highly selective barrier between the blood and the central nervous system (CNS), and its main function is to protect the brain from foreign substances. This physiological property plays a crucial role in maintaining CNS homeostasis, but at the same time greatly limits the delivery of drug molecules to the CNS, thus posing a major challenge for the treatment of neurological diseases. Given that the high incidence and low cure rate of neurological diseases have become a global public health problem, the development of effective BBB penetration technologies is important for enhancing the efficiency of CNS drug delivery, reducing systemic toxicity, and improving the therapeutic outcomes of neurological diseases. This review describes the physiological and pathological properties of the BBB, as well as the current challenges of trans-BBB drug delivery, detailing the structural basis of the BBB and its role in CNS protection. Secondly, this paper reviews the drug delivery strategies for the BBB in recent years, including physical, biological and chemical approaches, as well as nanoparticle-based delivery technologies, and provides a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness, advantages and limitations of these delivery strategies. It is hoped that the review in this paper will provide valuable references and inspiration for future researchers in therapeutic studies of neurological diseases.

Indexed as

blood–brain barriercentral nervous systemdrug deliverynanotechnologyneurological disease

Identifiers

PMID39771589
PMCPMC11677317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.