ArticlePharmaceutics2024
Toxicological Assessment of 2-Hydroxychalcone-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy: Comparative In Vitro and In Vivo Approaches.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combining advanced 3D spheroid-based skin models with deep-learning-based image analysis enables in-depth investigation of keratinocyte differentiation and barrier function.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhotodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality that uses light to activate a photosensitizing agent, destroying target cells. The growing awareness of the necessity to reduce or eliminate the use of mammals in research has prompted the search for safer toxicity testing models aligned with the new global guidelines and compliant with the relevant regulations.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the impact of PDT on alternative models to mammals, including in vitro three-dimensional (3D) cultures and in vivo, in invertebrate animals, utilizing a potent photosensitizer, 2-hydroxychalcone.
methodsCytotoxicity was assessed in two cellular models: monolayer (2D) and 3D. For this purpose, spheroids of two cell lines, primary dermal fibroblasts (HDFa) and adult human epidermal cell keratinocytes (HaCat), were developed and characterized following criteria on cell viability, shape, diameter, and number of cells. The survival percentages of
resultsThe findings indicated that all the assessed platforms are appropriate for investigating PDT toxicity. Furthermore, 2-hydroxychalcone demonstrated low toxicity in the absence of light and when mediated by PDT across a range of in vitro (2D and 3D cultures) and in vivo (invertebrate animal models, including
conclusionThere was a strong correlation between the in vitro and in vivo tests, with similar toxicity results, particularly in the 3D models and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.