ArticlePolymers2024
Sustainable Multi-Cycle Physical Recycling of Expanded Polystyrene Waste for Direct Ink Write 3D Printing and Casting: Analysis of Mechanical Properties.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Promoting Green Concepts and Environmental Awareness by a Recycling Expanded Polystyrene with Acetone Experiment and an Interactive Digital Tool.Journal of chemical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work investigates the sustainable reuse of expanded polystyrene (EPS) waste through a multi-cycle physical recycling process involving dissolution in acetone and subsequent manufacturing via Direct Ink Write (DIW) 3D printing and casting. Morphology and mechanical properties were evaluated as a function of the manufacturing technique and number of dissolution cycles. Morphological analysis revealed that casted specimens better replicated the target geometry, while voids in 3D-printed specimens aligned with the printing direction due to rapid solvent evaporation. These voids contributed to slightly reduced stiffness in 3D-printed specimens compared to casted ones, particularly for transverse printing orientation. The defoaming process during dissolution significantly increased the density of the material, as well as removed low molecular weight additives like plasticizers, leading to a notable enhancement in stiffness. Successive dissolution cycles led to increased removal of plasticizers, enhancing stiffness up to 52 times (cast), 42 times (longitudinally printed), and 35 times (transversely printed) relative to as-received EPS waste. The glass transition temperature remained unchanged, confirming the preservation of polymer integrity. This work highlights the potential of EPS inks for sustainable, multi-cycle recycling, combining enhanced mechanical performance with the flexibility of 3D printing for complex, cost-effective designs, aligning with circular economy principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.