ArticlePolymers2024
Examining the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of a Novel Hybrid Thermoplastic Rubber Composite Made with Polypropylene, Polybutadiene, S-Glass Fibre, and Flax Fibre.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, twin-screw extruder and compression moulding techniques were utilized to fabricate polymer blends: polypropylene (PP), polybutadiene (PB), and composites using glass fibre (GF) and flax fibre (FF). During fabrication, the polymer ratios maintained between PP and PB were 90:10, 80:20, and 70:30. Likewise, the composites were fabricated by varying the ratios between the PP, PB, and GF, which were 90PP:10PB:10GF, 80PP:20PB:10GF, and 70PP:30PB:10GF. Additionally, a hybrid composite was fabricated by adding 20% FF to the 90PP/10PB/10GF blend. The mechanical characterization revealed that the tensile strength and modulus increased by approximately 24% and 23%, respectively, for the hybrid combination (90PP/10PB/10GF/20FF) compared to pure PP (from 21.47 MPa and 1123 MPa to 26.54 MPa and 1382 MPa). Similarly, flexural strength and impact resistance showed significant improvements in hybrid samples, with flexural strength increasing by approximately 15%. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was also carried out for impact-tested samples to understand the fibre-to-matrix adhesion behaviour. Regarding the DSC results, PP exhibited a melting peak between 160 °C and 170 °C. When incorporating PP into PB, a reduction in crystallinity was observed. Further, by adding GF to polymer blends, the crystallinity was increased. HDT and Vicat softening temperature results reported that the hybrid samples showed higher values of 79.3 °C and 88.2 °C, respectively, resulting in improvements of approximately 3.9% and 2.9% over standard PP. Findings from this study suggest that the novel combinations offer a promising synergy of flexibility, strength, and thermal resistance, making them suitable for medium engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.