ArticlePolymers2024
Effects of Fiber Orientation on the Bearing Strength of 3D-Printed Composite Materials Produced by Fused Filament Fabrication.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Pre- and Post-Processing on Pin-Bearing Strength of 3D-Printed Composite Specimens with Circular Notches.Polymers · 2025Article
- Innovative Approaches to Material Selection and Testing in Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Among 3D printing technologies, fused filament fabrication (FFF) is a fast, simple, and low-cost technology that is being explored in a variety of industries. FFF produces composites using thermoplastic filaments, limiting the applicability of welding. Therefore, mechanical fastening is required to join FFF composites with metals or dissimilar materials. The strength characteristics of fastened joints vary with fiber orientation, necessitating further research. Additionally, in the case of FFF, the strength trends may differ from those of traditional composites due to the voids and curved surfaces formed during the process. In this study, 3D-printed composite specimens with seven different fiber orientations were fabricated using the Markforged X7™ printer. The bearing strength and failure modes were analyzed as a function of fiber orientation. Unlike traditional composites, specimens with a ±15° fiber orientation exhibited a 7.56% higher bearing strength compared to those with a 0° orientation. However, the fracture energy of the ±15° specimens was 39.56% lower. Specimens with fiber orientations between 0° and ±45° primarily showed bearing failure modes, while those with orientations from ±60° to 90° exhibited net-tension failure modes. These results confirm that when using manufacturing methods like FFF, the strength trends vary with fiber orientation compared to traditional composites. Further research is necessary to optimize fiber orientation and improve structural performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.