ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Enhancing Wheat Spike Counting and Disease Detection Using a Probability Density Attention Mechanism in Deep Learning Models for Precision Agriculture.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fast Forward the Future: What Are the Key Drivers in Intelligent Sensing for Agriculture?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to improve the precision of wheat spike counting and disease detection, exploring the application of deep learning in the agricultural sector. Addressing the shortcomings of traditional detection methods, we propose an advanced feature extraction strategy and a model based on the probability density attention mechanism, designed to more effectively handle feature extraction in complex backgrounds and dense areas. Through comparative experiments with various advanced models, we comprehensively evaluate the performance of our model. In the disease detection task, our model performs excellently, achieving a precision of 0.93, a recall of 0.89, an accuracy of 0.91, and an mAP of 0.90. By introducing the density loss function, we are able to effectively improve the detection accuracy when dealing with high-density regions. In the wheat spike counting task, the model similarly demonstrates a strong performance, with a precision of 0.91, a recall of 0.88, an accuracy of 0.90, and an mAP of 0.90, further validating its effectiveness. Furthermore, this paper also conducts ablation experiments on different loss functions. The results of this research provide a new method for wheat spike counting and disease detection, fully reflecting the application value of deep learning in precision agriculture. By combining the probability density attention mechanism and the density loss function, the proposed model significantly improves the detection accuracy and efficiency, offering important references for future related research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.