ReviewToxics2024
Global Trends and Hotspots in Non-Targeted Screening of Water Pollution Research: Bibliometric and Visual Analysis.
Review in Toxics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-targeted screening (NTS) technology has been showing significant potential in identifying contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in water and has attracted great attention in academia in recent years. It is a method that analyzes samples without pre-selecting substances, enabling the detection and identification of unknown compounds, which is crucial for environmental health and public protection. This study uses the Bibliometrix package in R 4.4.1 and CiteSpace 6.3.R1 software to statistically analyze 589 relevant publications from the Web of Science Core Collection from 2007 to 2024. Our work concentrates on NTS of water bodies; thus, articles that only analyze water sediments without analyzing the water were not considered for inclusion. By conducting a quantitative analysis and visualizing the publication trends, countries, authors, journals, and keywords, the present study identifies research hotspots, compositions, and paradigms within this field, trying to analyze the horizontal and vertical development trends and structural evolution of the research area. The research found that the application of NTS in water pollution studies has progressed through three phases: theoretical exploration, rapid development, and steady progress. From the national level, China leads with the highest number of publications (131), followed by Germany (105), Spain (50), and the United States (39). The top three authors by publication volume are J. Hollender, Nikolaos S. Thomaidis, and Emma L. Schymanski, while the top three by citation count are J. Hollender, Emma L. Schymanski, and M. Krauss. However, international collaboration between countries and researchers still remains an area for improvement. Science of the Total Environment is the journal with the highest number of publications (81), and Environmental Science & Technology holds the highest number of citations. Research on NTS methodologies, suspect screening, and health risk assessments are hot topics in the academic community. Future research is expected to be multidisciplinary, with emerging hotspots likely to focus on including the identification of novel pollutants through NTS, toxicity assessments of biotransformed compounds, and the health impacts and mechanisms of related compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.