Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39770971›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2024

Association of Protein Intake with Sarcopenia and Related Indicators Among Korean Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Minjee Han, Kyungsook Woo, Kirang Kim

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minjee HanDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0000-3486-7161
Kyungsook WooDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.
Kirang KimDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3054-8758

Funding

This present research was supported by the research fund of Dankook University in 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDue to variations in the standards for optimal protein intake and conflicting results across studies for Korean older adults, this study aimed to quantitatively integrate existing research on the association of protein intake with sarcopenia and related indicators in Koreans aged 65 and older through meta-analysis.

methodsA total of 23 studies were selected according to the study selection criteria (PICOS). Sixteen cross-sectional studies, 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 2 non-RCTs were included in the review, with 9 out of 23 studies included in the meta-analysis. We used fixed-effects models and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

resultsA meta-analysis found that the risk of sarcopenia was significantly higher in the <0.8 g/kg/day protein intake group compared to the 0.8-1.2 g/kg/day and ≥1.2 g/kg/day groups, with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.25 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10 to 1.42;

conclusionsLower protein intake is associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia and low HGS in Korean older adults. To establish protein intake recommendations for the prevention and management of sarcopenia in this population, further well-designed RCTs incorporating both protein supplementation and resistance training are necessary.

Indexed as

Dietary ProteinsSarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesHand StrengthHumansRepublic of KoreaRisk FactorsDietary ProteinsagedKoreanmeta-analysisproteinsarcopeniasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39770971
PMCPMC11677379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.