Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39770876›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Consumer Knowledge and Willingness Pertaining to the Adoption of a Sustainable Diet: A Scoping Review.

Connor Dupuits, Elaine Mooney, Amanda McCloat

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Connor DupuitsNational Centre of Excellence for Home Economics, School of Home Economics, Atlantic Technological University (ATU), St. Angelas, Sligo F91 C634, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0002-3606-1019
Elaine MooneyNational Centre of Excellence for Home Economics, School of Home Economics, Atlantic Technological University (ATU), St. Angelas, Sligo F91 C634, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0009-1396-5358
Amanda McCloatNational Centre of Excellence for Home Economics, School of Home Economics, Atlantic Technological University (ATU), St. Angelas, Sligo F91 C634, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-1090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current food system is harming both planetary and human health. The shift to a sustainable diet can help alleviate both adverse effects. The aim of this review was to conduct a scoping review of the literature pertaining to consumer knowledge and willingness concerning the adoption of a sustainable diet. A total of 45 papers met the eligibility criteria. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were employed to conduct the scoping review. Studies reported that many participants have misconceptions regarding the meaning of a sustainable diet, and their willingness to adopt a sustainable diet was oftentimes low. Evidence also suggests that the lack of knowledge regarding sustainable diets and the reluctance to reduce meat consumption are chief factors hindering the transition to a sustainable diet. Gender imbalance was also evident with females forming the majority of total participants. During the time of the literature search, no studies were conducted in Ireland. Research needs to be conducted in this country, specifically on young consumers, to explore their knowledge and willingness to adopt a sustainable diet. This would provide further insights into the research area of sustainable diets.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeDietDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansMaleconsumer knowledge and willingnesshealthscoping reviewsustainable diet

Identifiers

PMID39770876
PMCPMC11679890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.