Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39770620›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2024

A Comparison of Three Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Human Stool Samples.

Wit Thun Kwa, Choon Kiat Sim, Adrian Low, Jonathan Wei Jie Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Matrix extension to bovine feces and evaluation of semi-automated DNA extraction methods for the detection ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wit Thun KwaCentre for Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7000-2544
Choon Kiat SimCentre for Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Singapore.
Adrian LowCentre for Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0997-2490
Jonathan Wei Jie LeeCentre for Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-8041

Funding

NUSMed internal grant NUHSRO/2022/071/NUSMed/Microbiome
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated nucleic acid extractors are useful instruments for the high-throughput processing of bio-samples and are expected to improve research throughput in addition to decreased inter-sample variability inherent to manual processing. We evaluated three commercial nucleic acid extractors Bioer GenePure Pro (Bioer Technology, Hangzhou, China), Maxwell RSC 16 (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), and KingFisher Apex (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) based on their DNA yield, DNA purity, and 16S rRNA gene amplicon results using both human fecal samples and a mock community (ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standard (Zymo Research Corp., Irvine, CA, USA)). Bead-beating provided incremental yield to effectively lyse and extract DNA from stool samples compared to lysis buffer alone. Differential abundance analysis and comparison of prevalent bacterial species revealed a greater representation of Gram-positive bacteria in samples subjected to mechanical lysis, regardless of sample type. All three commercial extractors had differences in terms of yield, inter-sample variability, and subsequent sequencing readouts, which we subsequently share in the paper and believe are significant considerations for all researchers undertaking human fecal microbiota research.

Indexed as

automated DNA extractorbead-beatingfecal microbiotaGenePure Prohuman fecal samplesKingFisher ApexMaxwell RSCZymoBIOMICS mock community

Identifiers

PMID39770620
PMCPMC11678849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.