ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Advancing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Limitations and Emerging Strategies.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 TCR-Edited NKp30 CAR T Cells Exhibit Superior Anti-Tumor Immunity to B7H6-Expressing Leukemia and Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Case Report: Combined umbilical cord blood and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with donor lymphocyte infusion for R/R AML post CAR-CLL1 failure.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy represents one of the most impressive advances in anticancer therapy of the last decade. While CAR T-cells are gaining ground in various B cell malignancies, their use in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains limited, and no CAR-T product has yet received approval for AML. The main limitation of CAR-T therapy in AML is the lack of specific antigens that are expressed in leukemic cells but not in their healthy counterparts, such as hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), as their targeting would result in an on-target/off-tumor toxicity. Moreover, the heterogeneity of AML and the tendency of blasts to modify surface antigens' expression in the course of the disease make identification of suitable targets even more challenging. Lastly, AML's immunosuppressive microenvironment dampens CAR-T therapeutic activities. In this review, we focus on the actual pitfalls of CAR T-cell therapy in AML, and we discuss promising approaches to overcome them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.