ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Biopolymeric Inhalable Dry Powders for Pulmonary Drug Delivery.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision nanomedicine for pulmonary diseases: from molecular targeting to clinical translation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Liposomal drug delivery for lung cancer therapy: progress, challenges, and future perspectives.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Recent advances in the application of polymeric nanoparticles to the pulmonary delivery of mRNA.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Inhalation Therapy: An Overview.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Outstanding Contributions to Aerosol Pulmonary Drug Delivery.Kona : powder science and technology in Japan · 2026Article
- Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of nebulized HL231 inhalation solution in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Influence of Different Amino Acids on the Aerosolization, Stability and Cytotoxicity of Spray-Dried Cannabidiol Dry Powder for Inhalation.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Beta cyclodextrin stabilized cupric oxide nanoparticles assisted thermal therapy for lung tumor and its effective in vitro anticancer activity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural and synthetic biopolymers are gaining popularity in the development of inhaled drug formulations. Their highly tunable properties and ability to sustain drug release allow for the incorporation of attributes not achieved in dry powder inhaler formulations composed only of micronized drugs, standard excipients, and/or carriers. There are multiple physiological barriers to the penetration of inhaled drugs to the epithelial surface, such as the periciliary layer mucus mesh, pulmonary macrophages, and inflammation and mucus compositional changes resulting from respiratory diseases. Biopolymers may facilitate transport to the epithelial surface despite such barriers. A variety of categories of biopolymers have been assessed for their potential in inhaled drug formulations throughout the research literature, ranging from natural biopolymers (e.g., chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid) to those synthesized in a laboratory setting (e.g., polycaprolactone, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)) with varying structures and compositions. To date, no biopolymers have been approved as a commercial dry powder inhaler product. However, advances may be possible in the treatment of respiratory diseases and infections upon further investigation and evaluation. Herein, this review will provide a thorough foundation of reported research utilizing biopolymers in dry powder inhaler formulations. Furthermore, insight and considerations for the future development of dry powder formulations will be proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.