Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39770325›Full record

SynthesisPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Systematic Review of Zoonotic Enteric Parasites in Synanthropic Mammalian Species in Florida.

Jeffrey M Perera, Claire Gurtler, Amber N Barnes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeffrey M PereraDepartment of Biology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Claire GurtlerDepartment of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Amber N BarnesDepartment of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6284-3634

Funding

University of North Florida University of North Florida Faculty Publishing Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Florida is home to a vast number of wildlife species that come into close contact with residents and domestic animals. As mammals are competent hosts for many zoonotic diseases, it is important to understand what exposure risks are present for both people and animals. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this review analyzed published literature spanning 1963 through 2023 documenting zoonotic enteric parasites in synanthropic wild mammals of Florida, excluding mice and rats. Between an initial search conducted in 2022 and updated search in 2024, 10,563 titles were reviewed. Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26 titles were included in the final analysis examining a range of acanthocephala, cestode, nematode, protozoa, and trematode parasite species. Of the results, most studies found at least one parasite in Florida raccoons (n = 14) with additional studies in opossums (n = 8), armadillos (n = 4), bobcats (n = 4), coyotes (n = 3), squirrels (n = 3), gray foxes (n = 1), red foxes (n = 1), an undeclared fox type (n = 1), and bats (n = 1). No studies were found documenting zoonotic enteric parasites in rabbits or moles. The transmission pathways for each parasite and the zoonotic exposure risks varied significantly. Coordinated One Health prevention and control efforts must be targeted for effectiveness.

Indexed as

Animals, WildMammalsZoonosesAnimalsFloridaHumansIntestinal Diseases, Parasiticepidemiologygastrointestinal diseaseinfectious diseasemammalsone healthParasitologywildlifezoonoses

Identifiers

PMID39770325
PMCPMC11728782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.