Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39770309›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Indoor and Outdoor Air Microbial Contamination During Different Reconstruction Methods of Historic Buildings.

Anett Lippai, Ádám Leelőssy, Donát Magyar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anett LippaiBiokör Technological and Environmental Protection Ltd., 1089 Budapest, Hungary.
Ádám LeelőssyDepartment of Meteorology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1053 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9583-0127
Donát MagyarNational Public Health and Pharmaceutical Centre, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8635-6451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of indoor air is dependent on a number of factors, including the presence of microorganisms that colonize the building materials. The potential for health risks associated with microbial contamination is a significant concern during the renovation of buildings. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of two reconstruction methods for historic buildings on air quality. The two reconstruction procedures were facadism, which preserves only the façade, demolishing the rest of the building and constructing a new building, and complete reconstruction, which involves internal renovation with a less intensive demolition. A total of 70 + 70 air samples, as well as surface and dust samples, were collected throughout the course of the reconstruction of the two buildings. In the case of facadism, total colony counts were found to be 2-4 times higher indoors than outdoors, even at the initial stage of the works. High concentrations of

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyAir Pollution, IndoorFungiAspergillusColony Count, MicrobialConstruction MaterialsDustEnvironmental MonitoringHumansPenicilliumDustair microbiologydisinfectiondispersion modelfungiindoor and outdoor air pollutionreconstruction

Identifiers

PMID39770309
PMCPMC11728534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.