Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39770306›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Early Detection Methods for Toxic Cyanobacteria Blooms.

Lauren Grant, Diane Botelho, Attiq Rehman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauren GrantDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Mary's University, 923 Robie Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada.
Diane BotelhoNew Brunswick Research and Productivity Council (RPC), 921 College Hill Rd, Fredericton, NB E3B 6Z9, Canada.
Attiq RehmanNew Brunswick Research and Productivity Council (RPC), 921 College Hill Rd, Fredericton, NB E3B 6Z9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2062-1969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harmful cyanobacterial blooms produce cyanotoxins which can adversely affect humans and animals. Without proper monitoring and detection programs, tragedies such as the loss of pets or worse are possible. Multiple factors including rising temperatures and human influence contribute to the increased likelihood of harmful cyanobacteria blooms. Current approaches to monitoring cyanobacteria and their toxins include microscopic methods, immunoassays, liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LCMS), molecular methods such as qPCR, satellite monitoring, and, more recently, machine learning models. This review highlights current research into early detection methods for harmful cyanobacterial blooms and the pros and cons of these methods.

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaHarmful Algal BloomAnimalsBacterial ToxinsChromatography, LiquidCyanobacteria ToxinsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansImmunoassayMass SpectrometryBacterial ToxinsCyanobacteria ToxinscyanobacteriacyanotoxinsELISAharmful algal bloomsLCMSqPCR

Identifiers

PMID39770306
PMCPMC11728696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.